[SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in India and US based Citrix solutions
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Tue Feb 10 17:17:45 UTC 2015
Yeah. The other thing is, Internet access especially to non work sites can
be through a separate network (accessible after you minimize the rdp
session) that is based in india with IPs provisioned based on business need.
On February 10, 2015 10:44:12 PM "DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet"
<dp at datasoftcomnet.com> wrote:
> I am not aware of any rule that mandates the need to provide local internet
> access if the company policy doesn’t allow that. I have lot of customers
> who provide no internet access at all.
>
> If the senior managers do need internet, they can use their laptops to
> browse by minimising the RDP screen. (at least that is what they do when
> the remote US side does not allow them to browse through the tunnel using
> the remote US gateways).
>
> Also - I am not aware of any rule that mandates that Indian browsing should
> happen only through Indian gateways. I will find out once more since I
> might have missed it.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Durga Prasad
>
> +919849111010
>
>
>
> From: Stefan [mailto:netfortius at gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 February 2015 22:17
> To: dp at datasoftcomnet.com
> Cc: sanog at sanog.org
> Subject: Re: [SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in
> India and US based Citrix solutions
>
>
>
> I am not sure how else to explain. I was referenced to the Indian Telegraph
> Act 1885, and amendments to such brought forth by the India Department of
> Telecommunications, in time, which, in what I am interested in, allegedly
> require local Internet access for all employees in India. This is not
> possible if using thin clients hosted in US-based DCs, designed to access
> the Internet in the US, unless those specific to India hosted virtual
> desktops being configured to "go back" to India (via some creative routing
> and/or proxy pacs, with proxy servers hosted in India) to comply with the
> alleged requirement. If the latter is true, then the bad performance I was
> alluding to: India employee accessing virtual desktop in the US DC, which
> then sends them back to India for Internet access.
>
>
>
>
> ***Stefan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:50 PM, <dp at datasoftcomnet.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I can help you on the technical advice.
>
> Many of our clients access servers in the US on a continuous basis. You get
> excellent bandwidth and uptime in India, particularly in the cities.
>
> However I did not understand the India-US-india round trip part.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards DP
>
> 9849111010.
>
>
>
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos if any.
>
>
>
> -------- Original message 9/02/2015 23:57 (GMT+05:30)
>
> To: sanog at sanog.org
>
> Subject: [SANOG] Telecom requirements for local Internet access in India
> and US based Citrix solutions
>
>
>
> Hi, everyone,
>
>
>
> I was wondering if someone could point me (or share direct, personal
> experience) to some information referencing local Internet access (per
> legal requirements for doing business) in India, if in need to utilize
> Citrix or VMWare solutions (virtual desktop) hosted in US-based Data
> Centers, at present with corresponding US Internet access. A redirection of
> such traffic from India -to-> US virtual desktop -to-> India local Internet
> access is definitely a technical possibility, but I assume that due to the
> latency would be practically useless.
>
>
>
> NOTE: due to internal security requirements, the "embedded" browser from
> some versions of thin client is not an option.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> ***Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> sanog mailing list
> sanog at sanog.org
> https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.sanog.org/pipermail/sanog/attachments/20150210/efd23841/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sanog
mailing list