[SANOG] Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment

[Lancheng Qin]

Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an interesting phenomenon that some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there are other studies [1, 2] noting the same phenomenon, little is known about why some network operators perform different filtering policies at different interfaces.


We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this end, we create an anonymous questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it.


Questionnaire link: 
https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current


Reference:
[1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurements-from-rovista/
[2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/


If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email to qlc19 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn


Best,
Lancheng

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.sanog.org/pipermail/sanog/attachments/20230523/863037dc/attachment.htm>